Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Wanted: Musicians, Poets, Artists

Sometimes I am SO inspired by my job! Just when I think I should call it quits, my kids pull through for me and remind me of all there is to love in literature and in working with such amazing students. Today, during our poetry lesson several classes asked if I really think that poets put all the effort into their poetry that we try to squeeze out of them. I based my answers on my own creation of music, poetry, and choreography.

In both classes, my explanation was something to this effect:
I think poetry is often a combination of natural talent and skillful writing. At the most basic level, poets are poets because they instinctively associate words in ways the rest of us don't; words naturally flow from them with sophistication and beauty. But I also believe that when a great poet encounters a glitch in his writing process, he knows how to draw from his skill and training; he knows how to use his head to compensate when the words from his heart are insufficient. It's the same with musicians, choreographers, painters. No matter the balance between an artist's talent and skill, it is important that we (the readers) know how to analyze his work intelligently and thoroughly. Especially if we ever hope to communicate our analysis with other readers, we must equip ourselves with a variety of analysis tools and common terminology.

From my own (obviously biased) opinion, I believe these ideas give great purpose to what teachers do in literature classes, even though year after year, new students contend "did the poet really mean to use all those euphemisms?" Still, today's discussions reminded me that I am blessed to have students who are willing to ask that question! I am blessed to work with thoughtful, passionate students who challenge me and who need to understand the intentions of our writers. And I am hopeful that one day they will learn to appreciate the "mind and heart" (Thanks, Whitworth!) behind this thing we call poetry.

So, to my artistic friends and family, I now want to understand your creative process. What inspires you? What brings the words/notes/colors to your fingertips? How do you balance your natural talent with your intellect?




2 comments:

sean lumsden said...

i think there needs to be the constant flow of input and output.
input is listening, reading or observing other artists to help stir your juices...but then you need the technique to be able to sift through what fits your vision AND the ability to execute that into whatever medium.
many musicians look down on studying technique or theory and say they would rather 'play from the heart' ... well that is well and good until you hear something in your head that your hands can't reproduce... then you just repeat the things you can play and get bored and boring.
technique will propel you into greater heights IF you continually challenge yourself with better input.
anyone can write...but only a writer can re-write. and that is an issue of technique.
technique though isn't an end unto itself...that is why it must be balanced with input to give yourself something to say or play...

sean lumsden said...

OH! and great article Miranda! s